Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Archaeologists Found 115,000-Year-Old Human Footprints Where They Shouldn’t Be

Archaeologists Found 115,000-Year-Old Human Footprints Where They Shouldn’t Be

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
science
23 Posts 17 Posters 39 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C cm0002@mander.xyz
    This post did not contain any content.
    Link Preview Image
    Archaeologists Found 115,000-Year-Old Human Footprints Where They Shouldn’t Be

    Archaeologists found 115,000-year-old human footprints where they shouldn't be—and they just might rewrite the history of human migration.

    favicon

    Popular Mechanics (www.popularmechanics.com)

    Björn TantauB This user is from outside of this forum
    Björn TantauB This user is from outside of this forum
    Björn Tantau
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Yepp, sounds like humans all right.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    8
    • C cm0002@mander.xyz
      This post did not contain any content.
      Link Preview Image
      Archaeologists Found 115,000-Year-Old Human Footprints Where They Shouldn’t Be

      Archaeologists found 115,000-year-old human footprints where they shouldn't be—and they just might rewrite the history of human migration.

      favicon

      Popular Mechanics (www.popularmechanics.com)

      A This user is from outside of this forum
      A This user is from outside of this forum
      abbadon420@sh.itjust.works
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      I hate the clickbaity title and will not click it. So I’m just gonna assume they’re talking about the moon

      U 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      70
      • A abbadon420@sh.itjust.works

        I hate the clickbaity title and will not click it. So I’m just gonna assume they’re talking about the moon

        U This user is from outside of this forum
        U This user is from outside of this forum
        uselessartifact
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Taken from the what you’ll learn in this article section at the top:

        1. Fossilized footprints in Saudi Arabia show human traffic on the cusp of a subsequent ice age.
        2. Like carbon dating, scientists use isotopes and context clues to calculate the approximate age of fossils.
        3. These human prints were surrounded by animals but not hunted animals, indicating humans were just thirsty.
        D 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        51
        • C cm0002@mander.xyz
          This post did not contain any content.
          Link Preview Image
          Archaeologists Found 115,000-Year-Old Human Footprints Where They Shouldn’t Be

          Archaeologists found 115,000-year-old human footprints where they shouldn't be—and they just might rewrite the history of human migration.

          favicon

          Popular Mechanics (www.popularmechanics.com)

          HegarH This user is from outside of this forum
          HegarH This user is from outside of this forum
          Hegar
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          given the fossil and archeological evidence for the spread of H. sapiens into the Levant and Arabia during [the era 130,000 to 80,000 years ago] and absence of Homo neanderthalensis from the Levant at that time, we argue that H. sapiens was responsible for the tracks at Alathar.

          Scientists: Since we already know H. Sapiens was here then, we think they did it.

          Headline: Human footprints shouldn’t be here then!

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          47
          • C cm0002@mander.xyz
            This post did not contain any content.
            Link Preview Image
            Archaeologists Found 115,000-Year-Old Human Footprints Where They Shouldn’t Be

            Archaeologists found 115,000-year-old human footprints where they shouldn't be—and they just might rewrite the history of human migration.

            favicon

            Popular Mechanics (www.popularmechanics.com)

            J This user is from outside of this forum
            J This user is from outside of this forum
            jizzmasterd@lemmy.ca
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            Ugh, probably tracking sand across my freshly washed floors!

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            3
            • U uselessartifact

              Taken from the what you’ll learn in this article section at the top:

              1. Fossilized footprints in Saudi Arabia show human traffic on the cusp of a subsequent ice age.
              2. Like carbon dating, scientists use isotopes and context clues to calculate the approximate age of fossils.
              3. These human prints were surrounded by animals but not hunted animals, indicating humans were just thirsty.
              D This user is from outside of this forum
              D This user is from outside of this forum
              dream_weasel
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              3. These human prints were surrounded by animals but not hunted animals, indicating humans were just thirsty.

              Uh… Thirsty for what? 😬

              Y 0 P03 LockeP 3 Replies Last reply
              1
              23
              • C cm0002@mander.xyz
                This post did not contain any content.
                Link Preview Image
                Archaeologists Found 115,000-Year-Old Human Footprints Where They Shouldn’t Be

                Archaeologists found 115,000-year-old human footprints where they shouldn't be—and they just might rewrite the history of human migration.

                favicon

                Popular Mechanics (www.popularmechanics.com)

                A This user is from outside of this forum
                A This user is from outside of this forum
                aboubenadhem@lemmy.world
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                The linked Popular Mechanics article cites this Smithsonian article.

                The Smithsonian article cites this National Geographic article and this Science Advances article (among others).

                The National Geographic article is paywalled.

                The Science Advances research article seems to be the original source—here’s the abstract:

                The nature of human dispersals out of Africa has remained elusive because of the poor resolution of paleoecological data in direct association with remains of the earliest non-African people. Here, we report hominin and non-hominin mammalian tracks from an ancient lake deposit in the Arabian Peninsula, dated within the last interglacial. The findings, it is argued, likely represent the oldest securely dated evidence for Homo sapiens in Arabia. The paleoecological evidence indicates a well-watered semi-arid grassland setting during human movements into the Nefud Desert of Saudi Arabia. We conclude that visitation to the lake was transient, likely serving as a place to drink and to forage, and that late Pleistocene human and mammalian migrations and landscape use patterns in Arabia were inexorably linked.

                A P03 LockeP 2 Replies Last reply
                1
                25
                • C cm0002@mander.xyz
                  This post did not contain any content.
                  Link Preview Image
                  Archaeologists Found 115,000-Year-Old Human Footprints Where They Shouldn’t Be

                  Archaeologists found 115,000-year-old human footprints where they shouldn't be—and they just might rewrite the history of human migration.

                  favicon

                  Popular Mechanics (www.popularmechanics.com)

                  Y This user is from outside of this forum
                  Y This user is from outside of this forum
                  Yggstyle
                  wrote on last edited by yggstyle@lemmy.world
                  #9

                  Right outside your bedroom window.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  6
                  • D dream_weasel

                    3. These human prints were surrounded by animals but not hunted animals, indicating humans were just thirsty.

                    Uh… Thirsty for what? 😬

                    Y This user is from outside of this forum
                    Y This user is from outside of this forum
                    Yggstyle
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    Look… What in nature haven’t we fucked.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    16
                    • D dream_weasel

                      3. These human prints were surrounded by animals but not hunted animals, indicating humans were just thirsty.

                      Uh… Thirsty for what? 😬

                      0 This user is from outside of this forum
                      0 This user is from outside of this forum
                      0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      Real estate?

                      gestures broadly at everything

                      dumnezeroD 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      4
                      • A aboubenadhem@lemmy.world

                        The linked Popular Mechanics article cites this Smithsonian article.

                        The Smithsonian article cites this National Geographic article and this Science Advances article (among others).

                        The National Geographic article is paywalled.

                        The Science Advances research article seems to be the original source—here’s the abstract:

                        The nature of human dispersals out of Africa has remained elusive because of the poor resolution of paleoecological data in direct association with remains of the earliest non-African people. Here, we report hominin and non-hominin mammalian tracks from an ancient lake deposit in the Arabian Peninsula, dated within the last interglacial. The findings, it is argued, likely represent the oldest securely dated evidence for Homo sapiens in Arabia. The paleoecological evidence indicates a well-watered semi-arid grassland setting during human movements into the Nefud Desert of Saudi Arabia. We conclude that visitation to the lake was transient, likely serving as a place to drink and to forage, and that late Pleistocene human and mammalian migrations and landscape use patterns in Arabia were inexorably linked.

                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                        acockworkorange@mander.xyz
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        You da real MVP.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        7
                        • C cm0002@mander.xyz
                          This post did not contain any content.
                          Link Preview Image
                          Archaeologists Found 115,000-Year-Old Human Footprints Where They Shouldn’t Be

                          Archaeologists found 115,000-year-old human footprints where they shouldn't be—and they just might rewrite the history of human migration.

                          favicon

                          Popular Mechanics (www.popularmechanics.com)

                          BonusB This user is from outside of this forum
                          BonusB This user is from outside of this forum
                          Bonus
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          On my lawn‽

                          C 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          2
                          • BonusB Bonus

                            On my lawn‽

                            C This user is from outside of this forum
                            C This user is from outside of this forum
                            cm0002@mander.xyz
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            BonusB 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            2
                            • A aboubenadhem@lemmy.world

                              The linked Popular Mechanics article cites this Smithsonian article.

                              The Smithsonian article cites this National Geographic article and this Science Advances article (among others).

                              The National Geographic article is paywalled.

                              The Science Advances research article seems to be the original source—here’s the abstract:

                              The nature of human dispersals out of Africa has remained elusive because of the poor resolution of paleoecological data in direct association with remains of the earliest non-African people. Here, we report hominin and non-hominin mammalian tracks from an ancient lake deposit in the Arabian Peninsula, dated within the last interglacial. The findings, it is argued, likely represent the oldest securely dated evidence for Homo sapiens in Arabia. The paleoecological evidence indicates a well-watered semi-arid grassland setting during human movements into the Nefud Desert of Saudi Arabia. We conclude that visitation to the lake was transient, likely serving as a place to drink and to forage, and that late Pleistocene human and mammalian migrations and landscape use patterns in Arabia were inexorably linked.

                              P03 LockeP This user is from outside of this forum
                              P03 LockeP This user is from outside of this forum
                              P03 Locke
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              [science-news-cycle.png]

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              0
                              • D dream_weasel

                                3. These human prints were surrounded by animals but not hunted animals, indicating humans were just thirsty.

                                Uh… Thirsty for what? 😬

                                P03 LockeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                P03 LockeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                P03 Locke
                                wrote on last edited by p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                                #16
                                • Thirsty - feeling thirst
                                • Thirst - a sensation of dryness in the mouth and throat associated with a desire for liquids, also : the bodily condition (as of dehydration) that induces this sensation

                                Jokes aside, why does everybody feel the need to gravitate towards the least popular definition here?

                                C 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                3
                                • P03 LockeP P03 Locke
                                  • Thirsty - feeling thirst
                                  • Thirst - a sensation of dryness in the mouth and throat associated with a desire for liquids, also : the bodily condition (as of dehydration) that induces this sensation

                                  Jokes aside, why does everybody feel the need to gravitate towards the least popular definition here?

                                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                                  corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  For fake Internet points?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  3
                                  • C cm0002@mander.xyz
                                    This post did not contain any content.
                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Archaeologists Found 115,000-Year-Old Human Footprints Where They Shouldn’t Be

                                    Archaeologists found 115,000-year-old human footprints where they shouldn't be—and they just might rewrite the history of human migration.

                                    favicon

                                    Popular Mechanics (www.popularmechanics.com)

                                    R This user is from outside of this forum
                                    R This user is from outside of this forum
                                    rizzrustbolt@lemmy.world
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #18

                                    Ceiling?

                                    D 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    11
                                    • 0 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                                      Real estate?

                                      gestures broadly at everything

                                      dumnezeroD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      dumnezeroD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      dumnezero
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #19

                                      Humans have been around, as a species, for 0.3 million years (approximately). The most recent 10,000 years are not a statistically representative sample of humans.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      1
                                      • C cm0002@mander.xyz

                                        BonusB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        BonusB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Bonus
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #20

                                        How does one get two upvotes and a heart on Lemmy? (Maybe it’s a Mander.xyz thing I never noticed before.)

                                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        1
                                        • R rizzrustbolt@lemmy.world

                                          Ceiling?

                                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                                          diurnambule@jlai.lu
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #21

                                          On the moon ?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          4

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post