Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Archaeologists Found 115,000-Year-Old Human Footprints Where They Shouldn’t Be

Archaeologists Found 115,000-Year-Old Human Footprints Where They Shouldn’t Be

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
science
23 Posts 17 Posters 39 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C cm0002@mander.xyz
    This post did not contain any content.
    Link Preview Image
    Archaeologists Found 115,000-Year-Old Human Footprints Where They Shouldn’t Be

    Archaeologists found 115,000-year-old human footprints where they shouldn't be—and they just might rewrite the history of human migration.

    favicon

    Popular Mechanics (www.popularmechanics.com)

    A This user is from outside of this forum
    A This user is from outside of this forum
    aboubenadhem@lemmy.world
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    The linked Popular Mechanics article cites this Smithsonian article.

    The Smithsonian article cites this National Geographic article and this Science Advances article (among others).

    The National Geographic article is paywalled.

    The Science Advances research article seems to be the original source—here’s the abstract:

    The nature of human dispersals out of Africa has remained elusive because of the poor resolution of paleoecological data in direct association with remains of the earliest non-African people. Here, we report hominin and non-hominin mammalian tracks from an ancient lake deposit in the Arabian Peninsula, dated within the last interglacial. The findings, it is argued, likely represent the oldest securely dated evidence for Homo sapiens in Arabia. The paleoecological evidence indicates a well-watered semi-arid grassland setting during human movements into the Nefud Desert of Saudi Arabia. We conclude that visitation to the lake was transient, likely serving as a place to drink and to forage, and that late Pleistocene human and mammalian migrations and landscape use patterns in Arabia were inexorably linked.

    A P03 LockeP 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    25
    • C cm0002@mander.xyz
      This post did not contain any content.
      Link Preview Image
      Archaeologists Found 115,000-Year-Old Human Footprints Where They Shouldn’t Be

      Archaeologists found 115,000-year-old human footprints where they shouldn't be—and they just might rewrite the history of human migration.

      favicon

      Popular Mechanics (www.popularmechanics.com)

      Y This user is from outside of this forum
      Y This user is from outside of this forum
      Yggstyle
      wrote on last edited by yggstyle@lemmy.world
      #9

      Right outside your bedroom window.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      6
      • D dream_weasel

        3. These human prints were surrounded by animals but not hunted animals, indicating humans were just thirsty.

        Uh… Thirsty for what? 😬

        Y This user is from outside of this forum
        Y This user is from outside of this forum
        Yggstyle
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        Look… What in nature haven’t we fucked.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        16
        • D dream_weasel

          3. These human prints were surrounded by animals but not hunted animals, indicating humans were just thirsty.

          Uh… Thirsty for what? 😬

          0 This user is from outside of this forum
          0 This user is from outside of this forum
          0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          Real estate?

          gestures broadly at everything

          dumnezeroD 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          4
          • A aboubenadhem@lemmy.world

            The linked Popular Mechanics article cites this Smithsonian article.

            The Smithsonian article cites this National Geographic article and this Science Advances article (among others).

            The National Geographic article is paywalled.

            The Science Advances research article seems to be the original source—here’s the abstract:

            The nature of human dispersals out of Africa has remained elusive because of the poor resolution of paleoecological data in direct association with remains of the earliest non-African people. Here, we report hominin and non-hominin mammalian tracks from an ancient lake deposit in the Arabian Peninsula, dated within the last interglacial. The findings, it is argued, likely represent the oldest securely dated evidence for Homo sapiens in Arabia. The paleoecological evidence indicates a well-watered semi-arid grassland setting during human movements into the Nefud Desert of Saudi Arabia. We conclude that visitation to the lake was transient, likely serving as a place to drink and to forage, and that late Pleistocene human and mammalian migrations and landscape use patterns in Arabia were inexorably linked.

            A This user is from outside of this forum
            A This user is from outside of this forum
            acockworkorange@mander.xyz
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            You da real MVP.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            7
            • C cm0002@mander.xyz
              This post did not contain any content.
              Link Preview Image
              Archaeologists Found 115,000-Year-Old Human Footprints Where They Shouldn’t Be

              Archaeologists found 115,000-year-old human footprints where they shouldn't be—and they just might rewrite the history of human migration.

              favicon

              Popular Mechanics (www.popularmechanics.com)

              BonusB This user is from outside of this forum
              BonusB This user is from outside of this forum
              Bonus
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              On my lawn‽

              C 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              2
              • BonusB Bonus

                On my lawn‽

                C This user is from outside of this forum
                C This user is from outside of this forum
                cm0002@mander.xyz
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                BonusB 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                2
                • A aboubenadhem@lemmy.world

                  The linked Popular Mechanics article cites this Smithsonian article.

                  The Smithsonian article cites this National Geographic article and this Science Advances article (among others).

                  The National Geographic article is paywalled.

                  The Science Advances research article seems to be the original source—here’s the abstract:

                  The nature of human dispersals out of Africa has remained elusive because of the poor resolution of paleoecological data in direct association with remains of the earliest non-African people. Here, we report hominin and non-hominin mammalian tracks from an ancient lake deposit in the Arabian Peninsula, dated within the last interglacial. The findings, it is argued, likely represent the oldest securely dated evidence for Homo sapiens in Arabia. The paleoecological evidence indicates a well-watered semi-arid grassland setting during human movements into the Nefud Desert of Saudi Arabia. We conclude that visitation to the lake was transient, likely serving as a place to drink and to forage, and that late Pleistocene human and mammalian migrations and landscape use patterns in Arabia were inexorably linked.

                  P03 LockeP This user is from outside of this forum
                  P03 LockeP This user is from outside of this forum
                  P03 Locke
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  [science-news-cycle.png]

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  0
                  • D dream_weasel

                    3. These human prints were surrounded by animals but not hunted animals, indicating humans were just thirsty.

                    Uh… Thirsty for what? 😬

                    P03 LockeP This user is from outside of this forum
                    P03 LockeP This user is from outside of this forum
                    P03 Locke
                    wrote on last edited by p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    #16
                    • Thirsty - feeling thirst
                    • Thirst - a sensation of dryness in the mouth and throat associated with a desire for liquids, also : the bodily condition (as of dehydration) that induces this sensation

                    Jokes aside, why does everybody feel the need to gravitate towards the least popular definition here?

                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    3
                    • P03 LockeP P03 Locke
                      • Thirsty - feeling thirst
                      • Thirst - a sensation of dryness in the mouth and throat associated with a desire for liquids, also : the bodily condition (as of dehydration) that induces this sensation

                      Jokes aside, why does everybody feel the need to gravitate towards the least popular definition here?

                      C This user is from outside of this forum
                      C This user is from outside of this forum
                      corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      For fake Internet points?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      3
                      • C cm0002@mander.xyz
                        This post did not contain any content.
                        Link Preview Image
                        Archaeologists Found 115,000-Year-Old Human Footprints Where They Shouldn’t Be

                        Archaeologists found 115,000-year-old human footprints where they shouldn't be—and they just might rewrite the history of human migration.

                        favicon

                        Popular Mechanics (www.popularmechanics.com)

                        R This user is from outside of this forum
                        R This user is from outside of this forum
                        rizzrustbolt@lemmy.world
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        Ceiling?

                        D 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        11
                        • 0 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                          Real estate?

                          gestures broadly at everything

                          dumnezeroD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dumnezeroD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dumnezero
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          Humans have been around, as a species, for 0.3 million years (approximately). The most recent 10,000 years are not a statistically representative sample of humans.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          1
                          • C cm0002@mander.xyz

                            BonusB This user is from outside of this forum
                            BonusB This user is from outside of this forum
                            Bonus
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            How does one get two upvotes and a heart on Lemmy? (Maybe it’s a Mander.xyz thing I never noticed before.)

                            C 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            1
                            • R rizzrustbolt@lemmy.world

                              Ceiling?

                              D This user is from outside of this forum
                              D This user is from outside of this forum
                              diurnambule@jlai.lu
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              On the moon ?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              4
                              • BonusB Bonus

                                How does one get two upvotes and a heart on Lemmy? (Maybe it’s a Mander.xyz thing I never noticed before.)

                                C This user is from outside of this forum
                                C This user is from outside of this forum
                                cm0002@mander.xyz
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #22

                                It’s client dependent, but for that one the heart is the final karma score after downvotes and upvotes are calculated together

                                BonusB 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                1
                                • C cm0002@mander.xyz

                                  It’s client dependent, but for that one the heart is the final karma score after downvotes and upvotes are calculated together

                                  BonusB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  BonusB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Bonus
                                  wrote on last edited by bonus@mander.xyz
                                  #23

                                  Oh, interesting. I’m seeing it on my comment. Haven’t noticed this on other instances before. Thanks!

                                  Someone downvoted my question. Classic.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  1

                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                  • First post
                                    Last post