Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. TechTakes
  3. Musk wants to merge SpaceX with xAI, then take it public

Musk wants to merge SpaceX with xAI, then take it public

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved TechTakes
techtakes
24 Posts 19 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • David GerardD David Gerard

    Or maybe Tesla

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMKyocHwUJI&list=UU9rJrMVgcXTfa8xuMnbhAEA - video
    https://pivottoai.libsyn.com/20260202-musk-wants-to-merge-spacex-with-xai-then-go-public - podcast

    time: 5 min 18 sec

    UPDATE: the merge has gone through, apparently for “$250 billion” of imaginary value of private company equity

    S This user is from outside of this forum
    S This user is from outside of this forum
    scruiser@awful.systems
    wrote last edited by
    #8

    Has anyone done the math on if Elon can keep these plates spinning until he dies of old age or if it will implode sooner than that? I wouldn’t think he can keep this up another decade, but I wouldn’t have predicted Tesla limping along as long as it has even as Elon squeezes more money out of it, so idk. It would be really satisfying to watch Elon’s empire implode, but probably he holds onto millions even if he loses billions because consequences aren’t for the ultra rich in America.

    P C 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • S scruiser@awful.systems

      Has anyone done the math on if Elon can keep these plates spinning until he dies of old age or if it will implode sooner than that? I wouldn’t think he can keep this up another decade, but I wouldn’t have predicted Tesla limping along as long as it has even as Elon squeezes more money out of it, so idk. It would be really satisfying to watch Elon’s empire implode, but probably he holds onto millions even if he loses billions because consequences aren’t for the ultra rich in America.

      P This user is from outside of this forum
      P This user is from outside of this forum
      Plum
      wrote last edited by
      #9

      Trump did.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S scruiser@awful.systems

        Has anyone done the math on if Elon can keep these plates spinning until he dies of old age or if it will implode sooner than that? I wouldn’t think he can keep this up another decade, but I wouldn’t have predicted Tesla limping along as long as it has even as Elon squeezes more money out of it, so idk. It would be really satisfying to watch Elon’s empire implode, but probably he holds onto millions even if he loses billions because consequences aren’t for the ultra rich in America.

        C This user is from outside of this forum
        C This user is from outside of this forum
        corbin@awful.systems
        wrote last edited by
        #10

        I wonder whether his holdings could be nationalized as a matter of national security.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • David GerardD David Gerard

          Or maybe Tesla

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMKyocHwUJI&list=UU9rJrMVgcXTfa8xuMnbhAEA - video
          https://pivottoai.libsyn.com/20260202-musk-wants-to-merge-spacex-with-xai-then-go-public - podcast

          time: 5 min 18 sec

          UPDATE: the merge has gone through, apparently for “$250 billion” of imaginary value of private company equity

          R This user is from outside of this forum
          R This user is from outside of this forum
          ramenshaman@lemmy.world
          wrote last edited by
          #11

          SpaceX is actually really fucking successful, why would be destroy it by tainting it with shitty AI? Oh right, because he’s a moron who does way too much ketamine.

          F 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S seaguy05@lemmy.world

            SpaceX can’t go bankrupt… You won’t let us go bankrupt… It would be a shame if all those satellites lost their ability to be maintained. This is how he becomes too big to fail.

            T This user is from outside of this forum
            T This user is from outside of this forum
            transcendentalempire@lemmy.today
            wrote last edited by
            #12

            shame if all those satellites lost their ability to be maintained

            I mean, what’s the worst that could happen? They’d just burn up in the atmosphere. More than likely the government would just take possession of the system if they had a critical dependency on them.

            self@awful.systemsS 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E This user is from outside of this forum
              E This user is from outside of this forum
              erac@lemmings.world
              wrote last edited by
              #13

              It also owns Twitter because Musk spent $33 billion in AI investment cash to buy Twitter from himself to pay off his debt.

              Now he is using space investment money to pay off the AI investors.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T transcendentalempire@lemmy.today

                shame if all those satellites lost their ability to be maintained

                I mean, what’s the worst that could happen? They’d just burn up in the atmosphere. More than likely the government would just take possession of the system if they had a critical dependency on them.

                self@awful.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
                self@awful.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
                self@awful.systems
                wrote last edited by
                #14

                Kessler syndrome, and historically starlink’s satellites don’t always burn up in the atmosphere as they should

                G 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • self@awful.systemsS self@awful.systems

                  Kessler syndrome, and historically starlink’s satellites don’t always burn up in the atmosphere as they should

                  G This user is from outside of this forum
                  G This user is from outside of this forum
                  GreyEyedGhost
                  wrote last edited by
                  #15

                  For the millionth time, if every satellite in the starlink constellation were to fail today, they would be gone in about five years at the high end. They are low enough in the atmosphere that they have to fire station-keeping rockets to maintain orbit. If they collide, the small pieces deorbit even faster due to drag.

                  From this article:

                  At around 400 kilometers and into the 500-km realm — home to ISS and the SpaceX Starlink satellites among others — atmospheric drag plays a major role. Dead satellites and debris usually slow and burn up in the atmosphere in just a few years. This natural cleansing process accelerates when the sun becomes more active and solar coronal mass ejections strike Earth and cause the atmosphere to swell.

                  “In those altitudes, we can probably do a lot and we will be forgiven,” Linares says.

                  self@awful.systemsS B 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • G GreyEyedGhost

                    For the millionth time, if every satellite in the starlink constellation were to fail today, they would be gone in about five years at the high end. They are low enough in the atmosphere that they have to fire station-keeping rockets to maintain orbit. If they collide, the small pieces deorbit even faster due to drag.

                    From this article:

                    At around 400 kilometers and into the 500-km realm — home to ISS and the SpaceX Starlink satellites among others — atmospheric drag plays a major role. Dead satellites and debris usually slow and burn up in the atmosphere in just a few years. This natural cleansing process accelerates when the sun becomes more active and solar coronal mass ejections strike Earth and cause the atmosphere to swell.

                    “In those altitudes, we can probably do a lot and we will be forgiven,” Linares says.

                    self@awful.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
                    self@awful.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
                    self@awful.systems
                    wrote last edited by
                    #16

                    uh huh. spacex fans are fucking wild

                    self@awful.systemsS 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • G GreyEyedGhost

                      For the millionth time, if every satellite in the starlink constellation were to fail today, they would be gone in about five years at the high end. They are low enough in the atmosphere that they have to fire station-keeping rockets to maintain orbit. If they collide, the small pieces deorbit even faster due to drag.

                      From this article:

                      At around 400 kilometers and into the 500-km realm — home to ISS and the SpaceX Starlink satellites among others — atmospheric drag plays a major role. Dead satellites and debris usually slow and burn up in the atmosphere in just a few years. This natural cleansing process accelerates when the sun becomes more active and solar coronal mass ejections strike Earth and cause the atmosphere to swell.

                      “In those altitudes, we can probably do a lot and we will be forgiven,” Linares says.

                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                      burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                      wrote last edited by
                      #17

                      Agreed in general, but debris from collisions can head upwards as well.

                      For example, Kosmos-1408 orbited at about 475km and left debris from 300-1100km. This is an older debris chart, but it shows that event in red.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • self@awful.systemsS self@awful.systems

                        uh huh. spacex fans are fucking wild

                        self@awful.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
                        self@awful.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
                        self@awful.systems
                        wrote last edited by
                        #18

                        anyone else who wants to tell me “for the millionth time” about how it’s super safe to fill low-earth orbit with unprecedented amounts of literal garbage in pursuit of creating a shit-tier ISP that’s sucked hard every time I’ve used it is welcome to take it up with the professor of astronomy that wrote that last article

                        “it’s not Kessler syndrome unless it’s from the Kessler region of space, otherwise it’s just sparkling Rods from God” fuck you

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R ramenshaman@lemmy.world

                          SpaceX is actually really fucking successful, why would be destroy it by tainting it with shitty AI? Oh right, because he’s a moron who does way too much ketamine.

                          F This user is from outside of this forum
                          F This user is from outside of this forum
                          floppybiscuits@lemmy.world
                          wrote last edited by
                          #19

                          I’m assuming you mean operationally but not financially? They wouldn’t have to raise capital so much if it were financially so…

                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F floppybiscuits@lemmy.world

                            I’m assuming you mean operationally but not financially? They wouldn’t have to raise capital so much if it were financially so…

                            R This user is from outside of this forum
                            R This user is from outside of this forum
                            ramenshaman@lemmy.world
                            wrote last edited by
                            #20

                            I’m using the success rate of the Falcon 9 rocket and how many launches they do as my metrics. If they’re not doing well financially then they’re making some questionable financial decisions.

                            self@awful.systemsS F 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • R ramenshaman@lemmy.world

                              I’m using the success rate of the Falcon 9 rocket and how many launches they do as my metrics. If they’re not doing well financially then they’re making some questionable financial decisions.

                              self@awful.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
                              self@awful.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
                              self@awful.systems
                              wrote last edited by
                              #21

                              no space bois thx

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R ramenshaman@lemmy.world

                                I’m using the success rate of the Falcon 9 rocket and how many launches they do as my metrics. If they’re not doing well financially then they’re making some questionable financial decisions.

                                F This user is from outside of this forum
                                F This user is from outside of this forum
                                froztbyte@awful.systems
                                wrote last edited by
                                #22

                                Spacex, walking the path of something solved literally 4 decades ago: blows up many rockets

                                Yeah, super successful. As a grift of course, because that’s what it is

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • o7___o7@awful.systemsO o7___o7@awful.systems

                                  When Woke 2 comes, we’ll nationalize SpaceX.

                                  F This user is from outside of this forum
                                  F This user is from outside of this forum
                                  froztbyte@awful.systems
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #23

                                  We can turn it into a horror-themed exhibit park. And sell vip tickets for using some of the more particular roams as rage rooms, just smash all that nonsense up

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S seaguy05@lemmy.world

                                    SpaceX can’t go bankrupt… You won’t let us go bankrupt… It would be a shame if all those satellites lost their ability to be maintained. This is how he becomes too big to fail.

                                    Charlie StrossC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Charlie StrossC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Charlie Stross
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #24

                                    @Seaguy05 @techtakes Bear in mind SpaceX's near monopoly is transient: Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin is now flying and re-using New Glenn and ramping up launch cadence aggressively. Give it 5 years and unless Starship works 100% to plan, SpaceX will be eroding like Tesla today. (And this ignores the multiple Chinese reusable launcher startups with government backing.)

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0

                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Login

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                    • First post
                                      Last post