Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. At least 11 Toronto speed cameras vandalized this week

At least 11 Toronto speed cameras vandalized this week

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
118 Posts 42 Posters 854 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A arkouda@lemmy.ca

    You know that you can drive a car you don’t own right?

    You know it costs money to gas, maintain, insure, and/or rent a car right?

    And not every person who is ticketed is driving like an asshole. I got a 100 dollar ticket for driving 57 in what was normally a 50 km zone, but there was brand new signage up that I had literally 4 seconds to read (I went back and timed it) that gave: months of the year, days of the week, and hours of the day that the new 40 km/h speed limit was enforced. But because I can’t read at the speed of light while driving down the road, bam, ticket.

    Fact of the matter is you were speeding before they adjusted the sign, it is your responsibility as a driver to obey all posted signage, and if you cannot abide by the rules of the road as well as be capable of reading and responding to signage I do not believe you should be allowed to drive because you are a risk to everyone around you.

    You deserved that ticket, and I wish they had suspended your license until you were retested.

    B This user is from outside of this forum
    B This user is from outside of this forum
    balaquina@lemmy.ca
    wrote on last edited by
    #27

    LOL, a suspended licence for going 7 kms over the regular speed limit. Yeah, you’re a rational person alright, and I should take any argument you have seriously. Ok.

    And you know that you don’t have to gas, maintain, insure or rent a car that you borrow from a friend of family member, right?

    Going 7 over the regular limit does not make me a danger to society you absolute lunatic, and it is the responsibility of the government to make sure that signage is CLEAR and READABLE to people on the road.

    Have a nice day.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    4
    • B balaquina@lemmy.ca

      LOL, a suspended licence for going 7 kms over the regular speed limit. Yeah, you’re a rational person alright, and I should take any argument you have seriously. Ok.

      And you know that you don’t have to gas, maintain, insure or rent a car that you borrow from a friend of family member, right?

      Going 7 over the regular limit does not make me a danger to society you absolute lunatic, and it is the responsibility of the government to make sure that signage is CLEAR and READABLE to people on the road.

      Have a nice day.

      A This user is from outside of this forum
      A This user is from outside of this forum
      arkouda@lemmy.ca
      wrote on last edited by
      #28

      You were going 17 over the posted limit, as per your story, and weren’t aware enough to know about it.

      You shouldn’t have a license.

      Take care.

      B G 2 Replies Last reply
      2
      • A arkouda@lemmy.ca

        You were going 17 over the posted limit, as per your story, and weren’t aware enough to know about it.

        You shouldn’t have a license.

        Take care.

        B This user is from outside of this forum
        B This user is from outside of this forum
        balaquina@lemmy.ca
        wrote on last edited by
        #29

        I was going 7 over the limit as per my story, a great big 50km/h hour sign where 40 km/h was only enforced certain hours of the day, certain days of the week, certain months of the year, all of which I was expected to read within literal seconds, and didn’t slow down enough in time.

        Any traffic enforcement officer would literally laugh in your face if you told them I shouldn’t have a license. Grow a brain. This will be my last post. Jesus Christ you are such a fucking moron.

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • A arkouda@lemmy.ca

          The school zones in my area are 30kph, and a lot of people find that excessive and want it slower, so 50 is wild to me.

          cecilkorik@lemmy.caC This user is from outside of this forum
          cecilkorik@lemmy.caC This user is from outside of this forum
          cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
          wrote on last edited by
          #30

          I believe rural school zones are sometimes 50km/h. In context the non-school zone speed limit is usually 80km/h or more, often with visibility from one horizon to the other and a sprawling parking lot, it’s not quite the same as a congested urban school with a driveway big enough to fit a single bus and dozens of cars parked along the curb.

          A 1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • cecilkorik@lemmy.caC cecilkorik@lemmy.ca

            I believe rural school zones are sometimes 50km/h. In context the non-school zone speed limit is usually 80km/h or more, often with visibility from one horizon to the other and a sprawling parking lot, it’s not quite the same as a congested urban school with a driveway big enough to fit a single bus and dozens of cars parked along the curb.

            A This user is from outside of this forum
            A This user is from outside of this forum
            arkouda@lemmy.ca
            wrote on last edited by
            #31

            Even when I lived in rural areas, the zones were 30kph where I am from. Parks, and playgrounds, are also generally included.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P Phoenixz

              How about instead of speed cameras you change your road designs? People won’t speed if they cannot speed safely.

              Make your roads less wide. Add some curves, depending on required max speed, you make the curves larger or smaller. On lower speed roads, add obstacles to drive around.

              There are many forms of traffic management that don’t require speeding cameras but then again, speeding cameras are for making the government money, not for traffic safety

              G This user is from outside of this forum
              G This user is from outside of this forum
              gamegod@lemmy.ca
              wrote on last edited by gamegod@lemmy.ca
              #32

              Honest to god, it’s not that hard to do 40 km/h in these zones. They post a sign telling you there’s a speed camera coming up. You just have to go 40 for like 20 meters to avoid a ticket.

              Why should we socialize the cost of “fixing” the road design, when we can instead make the individuals who speed pay?

              F x00z@lemmy.worldX P 3 Replies Last reply
              8
              • F fireretardant@lemmy.world

                We literally do not have enough law enforcement to properly enforce traffic laws. It is part of why average speeds have crept up to 10-20 over the limit. In fact enforcing traffic laws was kinda just something that was thrown at the police when cars were invented and we’ve never really stopped to think about it since.

                G This user is from outside of this forum
                G This user is from outside of this forum
                gamegod@lemmy.ca
                wrote on last edited by
                #33

                I can’t even remember the last time I even saw a cop doing speed enforcement in Toronto. Definitely not on the highways. It makes total sense to automate this, and I highly doubt anybody lost their job over it.

                F 1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • P programmingsocks@pawb.social

                  I don’t really care that much either way for speed cameras. They work in a very limited fashion, but they punish the poor the most, and the money goes to cops.

                  At the end of the day speed cameras are a solution to a problem that doesn’t need to exist. We are failing to use technology available to us for basically no reason - we already know how to slow people and calm traffic without any kind of economic/punitive incentive.

                  O This user is from outside of this forum
                  O This user is from outside of this forum
                  outlierblue@lemmy.ca
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #34

                  and the money goes to cops.

                  Actually most of the money goes to the company that owns and operates the speed cameras. A smaller portion goes to the city.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P Phoenixz

                    How about instead of speed cameras you change your road designs? People won’t speed if they cannot speed safely.

                    Make your roads less wide. Add some curves, depending on required max speed, you make the curves larger or smaller. On lower speed roads, add obstacles to drive around.

                    There are many forms of traffic management that don’t require speeding cameras but then again, speeding cameras are for making the government money, not for traffic safety

                    Nik282000N This user is from outside of this forum
                    Nik282000N This user is from outside of this forum
                    Nik282000
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #35

                    People won’t speed if they cannot speed safely.

                    …

                    I get it, good road design helps stop speeding but the idea that safety even crosses the mind of people going 80 in a 60 is laughable.

                    The fines should be compounding, after each ticket the fine goes up 10% until people learn to just drive the fuckin limit.

                    P G D 3 Replies Last reply
                    11
                    • P programmingsocks@pawb.social

                      I don’t really care that much either way for speed cameras. They work in a very limited fashion, but they punish the poor the most, and the money goes to cops.

                      At the end of the day speed cameras are a solution to a problem that doesn’t need to exist. We are failing to use technology available to us for basically no reason - we already know how to slow people and calm traffic without any kind of economic/punitive incentive.

                      Nik282000N This user is from outside of this forum
                      Nik282000N This user is from outside of this forum
                      Nik282000
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #36

                      but they punish the poor the most

                      They punish people who speed the most. If you make the needle on your dash point to the number that is posted on the road signs, you don’t get a ticket.

                      B 1 Reply Last reply
                      5
                      • G gamegod@lemmy.ca

                        I can’t even remember the last time I even saw a cop doing speed enforcement in Toronto. Definitely not on the highways. It makes total sense to automate this, and I highly doubt anybody lost their job over it.

                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                        fireretardant@lemmy.world
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #37

                        It may actually be a net positive in job creation between the installation, maintaince, and bureaucratic stuff.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        3
                        • S showroom7561@lemmy.ca

                          This is the way, but good luck getting that implemented. NIMBYs and “frustrated motorists” will push back, and it only takes a few to ruin good ideas.

                          N This user is from outside of this forum
                          N This user is from outside of this forum
                          nouveau_burnswick@lemmy.world
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #38

                          Fun thing about design changes, the motorists get less frustrated.

                          A big part of our frustration whole driving is that (at least in Ontario) design speed MUST be at least 20kph higher than posted speed.

                          So yeah, you get frustrated doing 30kph on a road designed for 60kph. You get less frustrated on a road with no posted limits anywhere that jsut naturally nakes you want to drive a speed that feels safe, and happens to be 30kph.

                          H S 2 Replies Last reply
                          3
                          • A arkouda@lemmy.ca

                            Have you ever seen an idiot driver in a roundabout?

                            N This user is from outside of this forum
                            N This user is from outside of this forum
                            nouveau_burnswick@lemmy.world
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #39

                            There are more design choices than just roundabouts…

                            A 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • N nouveau_burnswick@lemmy.world

                              There are more design choices than just roundabouts…

                              A This user is from outside of this forum
                              A This user is from outside of this forum
                              arkouda@lemmy.ca
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #40

                              There are more design choices than just roundabouts…

                              Do I have to list every single one for you to get the point?

                              Z 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • D davriellelouna@lemmy.world
                                This post did not contain any content.
                                Link Preview Image
                                At least 11 Toronto speed cameras vandalized this week, the latest in west end: police | CBC News

                                At least 11 Toronto speed cameras have been vandalized this week, police say, and the latest is outside Dufferin Mall in the city's west end. 

                                favicon

                                CBC (www.cbc.ca)

                                B This user is from outside of this forum
                                B This user is from outside of this forum
                                but_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
                                wrote on last edited by but_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
                                #41

                                I’m sure the city loves these cameras. Did you speed? Doesn’t matter, the camera says you did so pay up. Also these will ticket you for going even half a kilometer over, you can get a ticket for going 71 in a 70 where a human cop would just let that shit go

                                B 1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • G gamegod@lemmy.ca

                                  Honest to god, it’s not that hard to do 40 km/h in these zones. They post a sign telling you there’s a speed camera coming up. You just have to go 40 for like 20 meters to avoid a ticket.

                                  Why should we socialize the cost of “fixing” the road design, when we can instead make the individuals who speed pay?

                                  F This user is from outside of this forum
                                  F This user is from outside of this forum
                                  fireretardant@lemmy.world
                                  wrote on last edited by fireretardant@lemmy.world
                                  #42

                                  Both is good, because the way our streets are designed are both dangerous and expensive. Narrowing that 40 zone by the school can remove excess road space that now doesn’t need to be maintained, cleaned, plowed, or salted. The excess space could be used by school, have trees planted, or be used for alternative transport like transit or bikes.

                                  The roads are currently designed to prioritize driver throughput and provide “wiggle room” for driver error, often at the expense of people outside of the vehicle. Many of the concepts that engineers use to make highways safe were applied to city streets, which in hindsight maybe we don’t want our city streets to be designed like highways.

                                  H 1 Reply Last reply
                                  5
                                  • Nik282000N Nik282000

                                    but they punish the poor the most

                                    They punish people who speed the most. If you make the needle on your dash point to the number that is posted on the road signs, you don’t get a ticket.

                                    B This user is from outside of this forum
                                    B This user is from outside of this forum
                                    but_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #43

                                    I’ve gotten a ticket for going 1 over on a downhill. If you think that’s reasonable, you’re likely one of the idiots who created these things.

                                    Nik282000N 1 Reply Last reply
                                    11
                                    • B but_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world

                                      I’ve gotten a ticket for going 1 over on a downhill. If you think that’s reasonable, you’re likely one of the idiots who created these things.

                                      Nik282000N This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Nik282000N This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Nik282000
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #44

                                      Citation needed. They don’t set them at 1 over because it’s hard to prove they are that accurate, your speedo also only has to be +/-3% in Ontario.

                                      G 1 Reply Last reply
                                      6
                                      • F fireretardant@lemmy.world

                                        Both is good, because the way our streets are designed are both dangerous and expensive. Narrowing that 40 zone by the school can remove excess road space that now doesn’t need to be maintained, cleaned, plowed, or salted. The excess space could be used by school, have trees planted, or be used for alternative transport like transit or bikes.

                                        The roads are currently designed to prioritize driver throughput and provide “wiggle room” for driver error, often at the expense of people outside of the vehicle. Many of the concepts that engineers use to make highways safe were applied to city streets, which in hindsight maybe we don’t want our city streets to be designed like highways.

                                        H This user is from outside of this forum
                                        H This user is from outside of this forum
                                        healthetank@lemmy.ca
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #45

                                        The problem is that people are AWFUL at evaluating their own risk when driving, and drive at speeds that ARENT safe. Look at how few people leave appropruate stopping distances between vehicles, which is the #1 factor in preventing accidents.

                                        The methods you proposed would likely decrease the speed vehicles travel at (ie from 80 to 60) because drivers feel like they can’t travel at that speed, but the road likely still isn’t safe for vehicles to travel at 60 when its that narrow.

                                        Speed cameras catch everyone speeding, 24/7, and are the single best, economical, way to eliminate speeding from a road. Cop can’t pull over every vehicle going 80 on a 4 lane road rated for 60, but the camera can ticket them all.

                                        For sure, promote a narrower road, encourage MUP over sidewalks, and encourage safer driving when you talk to your councilors, but road reconstruction happens, generally, once every 25-50yrs. We can’t wait for that timeframe to fix these problems.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        4
                                        • N nouveau_burnswick@lemmy.world

                                          Fun thing about design changes, the motorists get less frustrated.

                                          A big part of our frustration whole driving is that (at least in Ontario) design speed MUST be at least 20kph higher than posted speed.

                                          So yeah, you get frustrated doing 30kph on a road designed for 60kph. You get less frustrated on a road with no posted limits anywhere that jsut naturally nakes you want to drive a speed that feels safe, and happens to be 30kph.

                                          H This user is from outside of this forum
                                          H This user is from outside of this forum
                                          healthetank@lemmy.ca
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #46

                                          Bigger problem is people are bad judges of risk while driving. People’s perception of how fast they can safely travel doesnt line up with their actual abilities.

                                          Roads are built with a design speed 20kph higher than the posted limit because that’s the margin left for safety. That covers things like balding tires, like a distracted driver not paying attention, or bad weather.

                                          There can be some changes (ie the number of municipalities that insist on a 4m wide lane is RIDICULOUS for residential roads), but the vast majority of the factors that make it “safe” to drive that speed are there for a reason.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          2

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post