Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. Rogers, Telus, Bell Warn They’ll Cut Investment If Forced to Share

Rogers, Telus, Bell Warn They’ll Cut Investment If Forced to Share

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
22 Posts 20 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R reannlegge@lemmy.ca

    Saskatchewan has a crown corp that leases out their airwaves and copper and fibre in the ground, what do the big three have to be sacred of? Oh competition, do duoplies hate the idea of letting knew people into the market.

    M This user is from outside of this forum
    M This user is from outside of this forum
    mongostein@lemmy.ca
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    Saskatchewan also has the cheapest cell phone rates in the country

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
    • R reannlegge@lemmy.ca

      Been on Sasktel all my life, started getting more actively involved in politics when Wall wanted to sell 49% (or 51% I don’t remember) of Sasktel as a trial run or whatever the heck he called it.

      N This user is from outside of this forum
      N This user is from outside of this forum
      notmyoldredditname@lemmy.world
      wrote on last edited by notmyoldredditname@lemmy.world
      #14

      I don’t see how 51% could be a trial of anything as they’d lose control. 49% you could see how pressure from investors harms the company though and could painfully be walked back from. Terrible idea though.

      D 1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • Sunshine (she/her)S Sunshine (she/her)
        This post did not contain any content.
        Link Preview Image
        Rogers and Bell Warn They’ll Cut Investment If Forced to Share [Update] | iPhone in Canada

        The Canadian Telecommunications Association (CTA)—the industry group representing the likes of Bell and Rogers—wants Canadians to believe that letting these telecom giants resell internet access on competitor networks will hurt investment, stall network upgrades, and slow down rural expansion. In a recent op-ed published in The Hill Times on June 11, association president Robert Ghiz (former

        favicon

        iPhone in Canada | Canada’s source for Apple, telecom, tech news, and deals (www.iphoneincanada.ca)

        K This user is from outside of this forum
        K This user is from outside of this forum
        Kindness is Punk
        wrote on last edited by
        #15

        Internet should be a public utility, not having access to affordable,reliable internet is one of the drivers of inequality and should not be left to corporations acting on the profit motive.

        1 Reply Last reply
        11
        • N notmyoldredditname@lemmy.world

          I don’t see how 51% could be a trial of anything as they’d lose control. 49% you could see how pressure from investors harms the company though and could painfully be walked back from. Terrible idea though.

          D This user is from outside of this forum
          D This user is from outside of this forum
          derisionconsulting@lemmy.ca
          wrote on last edited by derisionconsulting@lemmy.ca
          #16

          They were considering selling 49%, but the percentage is meaningless without looking at the articles, the bylaws, and resolutions. A lot of corporations make things more strict than the Bus Corp. act. You can always make things more strict, you can’t make them more lax.

          In fact, some things require a “Special Resolution” which is 2/3rds.
          BUT, that can mean 2/3 of the shareholders who show up, as long as enough people show up to make a quorum.
          And a quorum can be as small as 1 person, again, depending on the Articles, bylaws, and resolutions.

          If you feel like learning about the Saskatchewan Business Corporations act, here is it:
          https://www.canlii.org/en/sk/laws/astat/ss-2021-c-6/latest/ss-2021-c-6.html

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • Sunshine (she/her)S Sunshine (she/her)
            This post did not contain any content.
            Link Preview Image
            Rogers and Bell Warn They’ll Cut Investment If Forced to Share [Update] | iPhone in Canada

            The Canadian Telecommunications Association (CTA)—the industry group representing the likes of Bell and Rogers—wants Canadians to believe that letting these telecom giants resell internet access on competitor networks will hurt investment, stall network upgrades, and slow down rural expansion. In a recent op-ed published in The Hill Times on June 11, association president Robert Ghiz (former

            favicon

            iPhone in Canada | Canada’s source for Apple, telecom, tech news, and deals (www.iphoneincanada.ca)

            PyrP This user is from outside of this forum
            PyrP This user is from outside of this forum
            Pyr
            wrote on last edited by pyr_pressure@lemmy.ca
            #17

            They don’t invest, they take tax payer funded subsidies and then bill us for the pleasure.

            1 Reply Last reply
            8
            • Sunshine (she/her)S Sunshine (she/her)
              This post did not contain any content.
              Link Preview Image
              Rogers and Bell Warn They’ll Cut Investment If Forced to Share [Update] | iPhone in Canada

              The Canadian Telecommunications Association (CTA)—the industry group representing the likes of Bell and Rogers—wants Canadians to believe that letting these telecom giants resell internet access on competitor networks will hurt investment, stall network upgrades, and slow down rural expansion. In a recent op-ed published in The Hill Times on June 11, association president Robert Ghiz (former

              favicon

              iPhone in Canada | Canada’s source for Apple, telecom, tech news, and deals (www.iphoneincanada.ca)

              W This user is from outside of this forum
              W This user is from outside of this forum
              walktheplank@lemmy.world
              wrote on last edited by
              #18

              Yea well since the internet is gone to shit and corpos keep using me as a bank machine I’m seriously considering saying fuck the phone and internet. However I need some way to stay connected so we can organize the overthrow of our government. It’s the only thing keeping me online right now.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Sunshine (she/her)S Sunshine (she/her)
                This post did not contain any content.
                Link Preview Image
                Rogers and Bell Warn They’ll Cut Investment If Forced to Share [Update] | iPhone in Canada

                The Canadian Telecommunications Association (CTA)—the industry group representing the likes of Bell and Rogers—wants Canadians to believe that letting these telecom giants resell internet access on competitor networks will hurt investment, stall network upgrades, and slow down rural expansion. In a recent op-ed published in The Hill Times on June 11, association president Robert Ghiz (former

                favicon

                iPhone in Canada | Canada’s source for Apple, telecom, tech news, and deals (www.iphoneincanada.ca)

                acargitzT This user is from outside of this forum
                acargitzT This user is from outside of this forum
                acargitz
                wrote on last edited by
                #19

                Break them up into infrastructure and ISP services. Infrastructure is a natural monopoly, they can compete over services on top of it if they want.

                1 Reply Last reply
                4
                • Sunshine (she/her)S Sunshine (she/her)
                  This post did not contain any content.
                  Link Preview Image
                  Rogers and Bell Warn They’ll Cut Investment If Forced to Share [Update] | iPhone in Canada

                  The Canadian Telecommunications Association (CTA)—the industry group representing the likes of Bell and Rogers—wants Canadians to believe that letting these telecom giants resell internet access on competitor networks will hurt investment, stall network upgrades, and slow down rural expansion. In a recent op-ed published in The Hill Times on June 11, association president Robert Ghiz (former

                  favicon

                  iPhone in Canada | Canada’s source for Apple, telecom, tech news, and deals (www.iphoneincanada.ca)

                  T This user is from outside of this forum
                  T This user is from outside of this forum
                  tiger666@lemmy.ca
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #20

                  Why have we privatized public services? These companies should be nationalized and every executive put in jail.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • Sunshine (she/her)S Sunshine (she/her)
                    This post did not contain any content.
                    Link Preview Image
                    Rogers and Bell Warn They’ll Cut Investment If Forced to Share [Update] | iPhone in Canada

                    The Canadian Telecommunications Association (CTA)—the industry group representing the likes of Bell and Rogers—wants Canadians to believe that letting these telecom giants resell internet access on competitor networks will hurt investment, stall network upgrades, and slow down rural expansion. In a recent op-ed published in The Hill Times on June 11, association president Robert Ghiz (former

                    favicon

                    iPhone in Canada | Canada’s source for Apple, telecom, tech news, and deals (www.iphoneincanada.ca)

                    K This user is from outside of this forum
                    K This user is from outside of this forum
                    kichae@lemmy.ca
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #21

                    What investment? We’ve pumped millions of dollars into these companies to get them to expand their networks to rural communities, and they’ve just shoved it up their ass like a cash enema. They’re definitely not spending their own money on improving services.

                    The only systems they’re incentivized to improve are the ones that funnel our cash into their pockets.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    10
                    • Sunshine (she/her)S Sunshine (she/her)
                      This post did not contain any content.
                      Link Preview Image
                      Rogers and Bell Warn They’ll Cut Investment If Forced to Share [Update] | iPhone in Canada

                      The Canadian Telecommunications Association (CTA)—the industry group representing the likes of Bell and Rogers—wants Canadians to believe that letting these telecom giants resell internet access on competitor networks will hurt investment, stall network upgrades, and slow down rural expansion. In a recent op-ed published in The Hill Times on June 11, association president Robert Ghiz (former

                      favicon

                      iPhone in Canada | Canada’s source for Apple, telecom, tech news, and deals (www.iphoneincanada.ca)

                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                      binturong@lemmy.ca
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #22

                      These fucking whale-scale welfare queens must be nationalized. They think this threat of ‘taking our ball and going home’ is going to scare people, and it probably will convince the officials already open to lobbying; but let’s be very clear, they cannot just take their business and leave. Their infrastructure is here, their labour is here, and their market is here. If they really wanna sabre rattle, stop fucking around and say “okay then, leave, and pay the newly instituted 75% gross wealth and asset tax while you abandon Canadians who MADE you what you are today. And don’t fucking come back”. CEOs think they are indestructible, but we need only look to the past to see the truth, we just need principled and willful representatives who won’t sell us out for chips. That’s a whole other problem.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1

                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post