Radeon RX 9060 XT PCI Express 3.0, 4.0 & 5.0 Comparison (8GB vs. 16GB)
PC Gaming
5
Posts
5
Posters
8
Views
-
TL;DW:
- bottlenecks can easily be found with the new 8GB 9060 XT
- game developers have voiced that 8GB GPUs “have become a nightmare for them” when it comes to optimizing next gen titles.
- a considerable amount of dev time is wasted due to optimizing for 8GB GPUs.
- as consumers shouldn’t have to buy brand new GPUs only to find themselves screwed due to the unnecessary VRAM limitation; many gamers and reviewers are now pushing back against AMD and NVIDIA.
-
TL;DW:
- bottlenecks can easily be found with the new 8GB 9060 XT
- game developers have voiced that 8GB GPUs “have become a nightmare for them” when it comes to optimizing next gen titles.
- a considerable amount of dev time is wasted due to optimizing for 8GB GPUs.
- as consumers shouldn’t have to buy brand new GPUs only to find themselves screwed due to the unnecessary VRAM limitation; many gamers and reviewers are now pushing back against AMD and NVIDIA.
AMD fumbling a layup. They just need to move on from 8GB.
-
TL;DW:
- bottlenecks can easily be found with the new 8GB 9060 XT
- game developers have voiced that 8GB GPUs “have become a nightmare for them” when it comes to optimizing next gen titles.
- a considerable amount of dev time is wasted due to optimizing for 8GB GPUs.
- as consumers shouldn’t have to buy brand new GPUs only to find themselves screwed due to the unnecessary VRAM limitation; many gamers and reviewers are now pushing back against AMD and NVIDIA.
8GB in this day and age seems insane. I often feel uncomfortable with 12GB, and I don’t even play in 4k!
-
8GB in this day and age seems insane. I often feel uncomfortable with 12GB, and I don’t even play in 4k!
I’m upset I couldn’t get anything bigger than 16GB from AMD without going back a generation.
-
I’m upset I couldn’t get anything bigger than 16GB from AMD without going back a generation.
laughs and cries in 7900 XT with 20 GB, but FSR 3
