Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. TechTakes
  3. Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 1st February 2026

Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 1st February 2026

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved TechTakes
techtakes
209 Posts 47 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B bluemonday1984@awful.systems

    Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

    Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

    Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

    If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

    The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

    Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

    (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. What a year, huh?)

    gerikson@awful.systemsG This user is from outside of this forum
    gerikson@awful.systemsG This user is from outside of this forum
    gerikson@awful.systems
    wrote last edited by
    #74

    LWer: Heritage Foundation has some good ideas but they’re not enough into eugenics for my taste

    This is completely opposed to the Nietzschean worldview, which looks toward the next stage in human evolution, the Overman. The conservative demands the freezing of evolution and progress, the sacralization of the peasant in his state of nature, pregnancy, nursing, throwing up. “Perfection” the conservative puts in scare quotes, he wants the whole concept to disappear, replaced by a universal equality that won’t deem anyone inferior. Perhaps it’s because he fears a society looking toward the future will leave him behind. Or perhaps it’s because he had been taught his Christian morality requires him to identify with the weak, for, as Jesus said, “blessed are the meek for they shall inherit the earth.” In his glorification of the “natural ecology of the family,” the conservative fails even by his own logic, as in the state of nature, parents allow sick offspring to die to save resources for the healthy. This was the case in the animal kingdom and among our peasant ancestors.

    Some young, BASED Rightists like eugenics, and think the only reason conservatives don’t is that liberals brainwashed them that it’s evil. As more and more taboos erode, yet the one against eugenics remains, it becomes clear that dysgenics is not incidental to conservatism, but driven by the ideology itself, its neuroticism about the human body and hatred of the superior.

    Jack Riddle[Any/All]J rook@awful.systemsR S M 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • fullsquare@awful.systemsF fullsquare@awful.systems

      they prompted so hard and that’s all they get, so obviously there’s nothing better and they stop st that

      they’ll do anything except actually learn shit or put in effort

      M This user is from outside of this forum
      M This user is from outside of this forum
      mlen@awful.systems
      wrote last edited by
      #75

      All roads lead down from the local maximum

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sc_griffith@awful.systemsS sc_griffith@awful.systems

        i actually find the content pretty amusing, since it amounts to “have you guys tried using words correctly every once in a while?”

        Jack Riddle[Any/All]J This user is from outside of this forum
        Jack Riddle[Any/All]J This user is from outside of this forum
        Jack Riddle[Any/All]
        wrote last edited by
        #76

        the comments also do not get it at all. The guy going “don’t say you have 99% percent credence in something¹, for most people saying that it’s a virtual certainty is the same thing” these people cannot speak as a non-cultmember for even a second

        ¹yeah don’t, nobody says that

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • gerikson@awful.systemsG gerikson@awful.systems

          LWer: Heritage Foundation has some good ideas but they’re not enough into eugenics for my taste

          This is completely opposed to the Nietzschean worldview, which looks toward the next stage in human evolution, the Overman. The conservative demands the freezing of evolution and progress, the sacralization of the peasant in his state of nature, pregnancy, nursing, throwing up. “Perfection” the conservative puts in scare quotes, he wants the whole concept to disappear, replaced by a universal equality that won’t deem anyone inferior. Perhaps it’s because he fears a society looking toward the future will leave him behind. Or perhaps it’s because he had been taught his Christian morality requires him to identify with the weak, for, as Jesus said, “blessed are the meek for they shall inherit the earth.” In his glorification of the “natural ecology of the family,” the conservative fails even by his own logic, as in the state of nature, parents allow sick offspring to die to save resources for the healthy. This was the case in the animal kingdom and among our peasant ancestors.

          Some young, BASED Rightists like eugenics, and think the only reason conservatives don’t is that liberals brainwashed them that it’s evil. As more and more taboos erode, yet the one against eugenics remains, it becomes clear that dysgenics is not incidental to conservatism, but driven by the ideology itself, its neuroticism about the human body and hatred of the superior.

          Jack Riddle[Any/All]J This user is from outside of this forum
          Jack Riddle[Any/All]J This user is from outside of this forum
          Jack Riddle[Any/All]
          wrote last edited by
          #77

          the overman¹

          ¹better known by it’s german name

          M 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gerikson@awful.systemsG gerikson@awful.systems

            LWer: Heritage Foundation has some good ideas but they’re not enough into eugenics for my taste

            This is completely opposed to the Nietzschean worldview, which looks toward the next stage in human evolution, the Overman. The conservative demands the freezing of evolution and progress, the sacralization of the peasant in his state of nature, pregnancy, nursing, throwing up. “Perfection” the conservative puts in scare quotes, he wants the whole concept to disappear, replaced by a universal equality that won’t deem anyone inferior. Perhaps it’s because he fears a society looking toward the future will leave him behind. Or perhaps it’s because he had been taught his Christian morality requires him to identify with the weak, for, as Jesus said, “blessed are the meek for they shall inherit the earth.” In his glorification of the “natural ecology of the family,” the conservative fails even by his own logic, as in the state of nature, parents allow sick offspring to die to save resources for the healthy. This was the case in the animal kingdom and among our peasant ancestors.

            Some young, BASED Rightists like eugenics, and think the only reason conservatives don’t is that liberals brainwashed them that it’s evil. As more and more taboos erode, yet the one against eugenics remains, it becomes clear that dysgenics is not incidental to conservatism, but driven by the ideology itself, its neuroticism about the human body and hatred of the superior.

            rook@awful.systemsR This user is from outside of this forum
            rook@awful.systemsR This user is from outside of this forum
            rook@awful.systems
            wrote last edited by
            #78

            the conservative… wants… a universal equality that won’t deem anyone inferior.

            perhaps it’s because he had been taught his Christian morality requires him to identify with the weak

            Which conservatives are these. This is just a libertarian fantasy, isn’t it.

            v0ldek@awful.systemsV 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Jack Riddle[Any/All]J Jack Riddle[Any/All]

              the overman¹

              ¹better known by it’s german name

              M This user is from outside of this forum
              M This user is from outside of this forum
              mlen@awful.systems
              wrote last edited by
              #79

              Technically superman is a more correct translation for that word (similarly to how superscript is the thing beyond the script)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B bluemonday1984@awful.systems

                Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

                Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

                Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

                If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

                The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

                Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

                (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. What a year, huh?)

                N This user is from outside of this forum
                N This user is from outside of this forum
                nfultz@awful.systems
                wrote last edited by
                #80

                Signaling in the Age of AI: Evidence from Cover Letters

                Abstract We study the impact of generative AI on labor market signaling using the introduction of an AI-powered cover letter writing tool on a large online labor platform. Our data track both access to the tool and usage at the application level. Difference-in-differences estimates show that access to the tool increased textual alignment between cover letters and job posts and raised callback rates. Time spent editing AI-generated cover letter drafts is positively correlated with hiring success. After the tool’s introduction, the correlation between cover letters’ textual alignment and callbacks fell by 51%, consistent with what theory predicts if the AI technology reduces the signal content of cover letters. In response, employers shifted toward alternative signals, including workers’ prior work histories.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • blakestacey@awful.systemsB blakestacey@awful.systems

                  Is Pee Stored in the Balls? Vibe Coding Science with OpenAI’s Prism

                  Link Preview Image
                  Carl T. Bergstrom (@carlbergstrom.com)

                  So initial experiments with Open AI's vibe-coding science tool Prism are going about as well as expected.

                  favicon

                  Bluesky Social (bsky.app)

                  T This user is from outside of this forum
                  T This user is from outside of this forum
                  trashgoblin@awful.systems
                  wrote last edited by
                  #81

                  “Pee-er review” :kelly:

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F fiat_lux@lemmy.world

                    Amazon’s latest round of 16k layoffs for AWS was called “Project Dawn” internally, and the public line is that the layoffs are because of increased AI use. AI has become useful, but as a way to conceal business failure. They’re not cutting jobs because their financials are in the shitter, oh no, it’s because they’re just too amazing at being efficient. So efficient they sent the corporate fake condolences email before informing the people they’re firing, referencing a blog post they hadn’t yet published.

                    It’s Schrodinger’s Success. You can neither prove nor disprove the effects of AI on the decision, or if the layoffs are an indication of good management or fundamental mismanagement. And the media buys into it with headlines like “Amazon axes 16,000 jobs as it pushes AI and efficiency” that are distinctly ambivalent on how 16k people could possibly have been redundant in a tech company that’s supposed to be a beacon of automation.

                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    sansruse@awful.systems
                    wrote last edited by
                    #82

                    They’re not cutting jobs because their financials are in the shitter

                    Their financials are not even in the shitter! except insofar as their increased AI capex isn’t delivering returns, so they need to massage the balance sheet by doing rolling layoffs to stop the feral hogs from clamoring and stampeding on the next quarterly earnings call.

                    F 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • rook@awful.systemsR rook@awful.systems

                      the conservative… wants… a universal equality that won’t deem anyone inferior.

                      perhaps it’s because he had been taught his Christian morality requires him to identify with the weak

                      Which conservatives are these. This is just a libertarian fantasy, isn’t it.

                      v0ldek@awful.systemsV This user is from outside of this forum
                      v0ldek@awful.systemsV This user is from outside of this forum
                      v0ldek@awful.systems
                      wrote last edited by
                      #83

                      I had to do a triple take on that “won’t deem anyone inferior” like what the fuck are you talking about. The core of conservatism is the belief in rigid hierarchies! Hierarchies have superiors and inferiors by definition!

                      F 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S sansruse@awful.systems

                        They’re not cutting jobs because their financials are in the shitter

                        Their financials are not even in the shitter! except insofar as their increased AI capex isn’t delivering returns, so they need to massage the balance sheet by doing rolling layoffs to stop the feral hogs from clamoring and stampeding on the next quarterly earnings call.

                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                        fiat_lux@lemmy.world
                        wrote last edited by
                        #84

                        In retrospect the word quarterlies is what I should have chosen for accuracy, but I’m glad I didn’t purely because I wouldn’t have then had your vivid hog simile.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • v0ldek@awful.systemsV v0ldek@awful.systems

                          I had to do a triple take on that “won’t deem anyone inferior” like what the fuck are you talking about. The core of conservatism is the belief in rigid hierarchies! Hierarchies have superiors and inferiors by definition!

                          F This user is from outside of this forum
                          F This user is from outside of this forum
                          fiat_lux@lemmy.world
                          wrote last edited by
                          #85

                          That depends on if you consider the “inferior” to be human, if they’re even still alive after the eugenics part.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • B bluemonday1984@awful.systems

                            Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

                            Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

                            Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

                            If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

                            The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

                            Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

                            (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. What a year, huh?)

                            B This user is from outside of this forum
                            B This user is from outside of this forum
                            bluemonday1984@awful.systems
                            wrote last edited by
                            #86

                            New blogpost from Drew DeVault, titled “The cults of TDD and GenAI”. As the title suggests, its drawing comparisons between how people go all-in on TDD (test-driven development) and how people go all-in on slop machines.

                            Its another post in the genre of “why did tech fall for AI so hard” that I’ve seen cropping up, in the same vein as mhoye’s Mastodon thread and Iris Meredith’s “The problem is culture”.

                            J 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • B bluemonday1984@awful.systems

                              Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

                              Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

                              Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

                              If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

                              The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

                              Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

                              (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. What a year, huh?)

                              M This user is from outside of this forum
                              M This user is from outside of this forum
                              mirrorwitch@awful.systems
                              wrote last edited by
                              #87

                              OT: today the respiratory illness I’ve had for five days tested positive for Covid the first time just now.

                              My symptoms are fairly mild, probably because I reinforced my vaccine three months ago. But I’m trying to learn more about these recent “swallowing razors” variants and dang! the online situation is bad. Finding reliable medical information in the post-slop, post-Trump Internet is a nightmare.

                              S nightsky@awful.systemsN 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • B bluemonday1984@awful.systems

                                Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

                                Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

                                Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

                                If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

                                The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

                                Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

                                (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. What a year, huh?)

                                rook@awful.systemsR This user is from outside of this forum
                                rook@awful.systemsR This user is from outside of this forum
                                rook@awful.systems
                                wrote last edited by
                                #88

                                Just seen a clip of aronofsky’s genai revolutionary war thing and it is incredibly bad. Just… every detail is shit. Ways in which I hadn’t previously imagined that the uncanny valley would intrude. Even if it weren’t for the simulated flesh golems, one of whom seems to be wearing anthony hopkins’ skin as a clumsy disguise, the framing and pacing just feels like the model was trained on endless adverts and corporate speaking head videos, and either it was impossible to edit, or none the crew have any idea what even mediocre films look like.

                                I also hadn’t appreciated before that genai lip sync/dubbing was just embarrassing. I think I’ve only seen a couple of very short genai video clips before, and the most recent at least 6 months ago, but this just seems straight up broken. Have the people funding this stuff ever looked at what is being generated?

                                Link Preview Image
                                AmericanTruckSongs10 (@ethangach.bsky.social)

                                You don't have the be an avowed AI hater to be impressed without lifeless and unwatchable this is.

                                favicon

                                Bluesky Social (bsky.app)

                                blakestacey@awful.systemsB self@awful.systemsS 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • B bluemonday1984@awful.systems

                                  Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

                                  Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

                                  Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

                                  If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

                                  The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

                                  Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

                                  (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. What a year, huh?)

                                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                                  soyweiser@awful.systems
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #89

                                  Finally read Greg Egan - Permutation City, and looked at the LW discussion on the book, and I feel like they missed a lot of things (and why are they talking about the ‘dust theory’ like it is real). Oof, the wikipedia page on the themes and settings has a similar problem however. It is like they all ignored the second half of the book and the themes contained within it, not one mention of the city being called Elysium for example.

                                  And of course Zack_M_Davis thinks the plotline of the guy who killed the drug dealer (not a sex worker/prostitute lw people, please the text makes this pretty clear) he was in a lowkey romantic relationship with should have been cut (also not mentioned on the wikipedia page iirc).

                                  Also, nobody seems to talk about the broken sewage pipe.

                                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • rook@awful.systemsR rook@awful.systems

                                    Just seen a clip of aronofsky’s genai revolutionary war thing and it is incredibly bad. Just… every detail is shit. Ways in which I hadn’t previously imagined that the uncanny valley would intrude. Even if it weren’t for the simulated flesh golems, one of whom seems to be wearing anthony hopkins’ skin as a clumsy disguise, the framing and pacing just feels like the model was trained on endless adverts and corporate speaking head videos, and either it was impossible to edit, or none the crew have any idea what even mediocre films look like.

                                    I also hadn’t appreciated before that genai lip sync/dubbing was just embarrassing. I think I’ve only seen a couple of very short genai video clips before, and the most recent at least 6 months ago, but this just seems straight up broken. Have the people funding this stuff ever looked at what is being generated?

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    AmericanTruckSongs10 (@ethangach.bsky.social)

                                    You don't have the be an avowed AI hater to be impressed without lifeless and unwatchable this is.

                                    favicon

                                    Bluesky Social (bsky.app)

                                    blakestacey@awful.systemsB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    blakestacey@awful.systemsB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    blakestacey@awful.systems
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #90

                                    Mateusz Fafinski (‪@calthalas.bsky.social‬):

                                    Happy to see that there is no need to worry about the historical accuracy of new 1776 AI slop because it happens in the mystical land of Λamereedd.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • B bluemonday1984@awful.systems

                                      Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

                                      Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

                                      Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

                                      If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

                                      The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

                                      Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

                                      (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. What a year, huh?)

                                      rook@awful.systemsR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      rook@awful.systemsR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      rook@awful.systems
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #91

                                      Amazon Found ‘High Volume’ Of Child Sex Abuse Material in AI Training Data

                                      The tech giant reported hundreds of thousands of cases of suspected child sexual abuse material, but won’t say where it came from

                                      I’ll bet.

                                      Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

                                      favicon

                                      (www.bloomberg.com)

                                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M mirrorwitch@awful.systems

                                        OT: today the respiratory illness I’ve had for five days tested positive for Covid the first time just now.

                                        My symptoms are fairly mild, probably because I reinforced my vaccine three months ago. But I’m trying to learn more about these recent “swallowing razors” variants and dang! the online situation is bad. Finding reliable medical information in the post-slop, post-Trump Internet is a nightmare.

                                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                                        soyweiser@awful.systems
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #92

                                        Get well soon, yeah, I follow some people on bsky who have different opinions on Covid, and even there it is bad. (Doesn’t help than the one real expert I follow who mentions that ‘Covid is over’ (to massively oversimplify his points) treats any concern that it isn’t over as if people are antivaxxers and anti science, I don’t want to get involved, but several times I was close to replying ‘you are quite strawmanning their position and reading things into what they are saying which they are not’ but that would just get me blocked/called a covid truther or something so why bother).

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • sc_griffith@awful.systemsS sc_griffith@awful.systems

                                          i actually find the content pretty amusing, since it amounts to “have you guys tried using words correctly every once in a while?”

                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          soyweiser@awful.systems
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #93

                                          Yep, I have not paid attention to them using these words correctly, but considering how they treat the other rules of Rationalism more as guidelines anyway, I’m gonna guess no.

                                          But compared to an actual ‘here is yall speaking like evil robots, stop that’ article it is lacking. Which is good, as that is our territory. ;).

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post